• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • SUNY Brockport
    • Events/Conferences
    • 2015 SUNY Undergraduate Research Conference
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • SUNY Brockport
    • Events/Conferences
    • 2015 SUNY Undergraduate Research Conference
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Concept formation in young children: categorization of complex, asymmetric and impossible figures

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    surc/2015/schedule/363/fulltext (1).pdf (33.51Kb)
    Date
    2015-04-10
    Author
    O'Leary, Shay
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Subject
    Shape Perception
    Categorization
    Impossible Objects
    Perceptual Development
    Conceptual Development
    Abstract
    Adults readily detect structural coherence and it was recently discovered that young infants respond to pictures of impossible figures as well with increased looking, oculomotor activity and manual exploration (Shuwairi et al., 2007, Shuwairi & Johnson, 2013). Past research has demonstrated discrepancies between stimuli containing novel impossible figures suggesting that this increased attention could be associated with other perceptual properties such as symmetry or complexity, rather than inherent knowledge of global incoherence. The goal of this study is to evaluate the nature of children’s conceptual knowledge of the global properties of real 3D objects and to clarify how and when young children achieve an understanding of the various perceptual dimensions of objects, such as complexity, symmetry and coherence. A series of line drawings will be presented, each varying along one of the above-mentioned perceptual dimensions. Children will be instructed to sort all the shapes into two groups based on what seems most natural. After “free-sorting”, children are given a brief tutorial on particular aspects of shape geometry and instructed to sort the figures by that perceptual dimension to draw attention to the pertinent properties of these objects (e.g., drawing a butterfly while emphasizing equivalent left-right sides). Children are expected to engage in free-sorting the shapes based on low-level shape similarities (like round vs. straight edges) rather than higher-level categorical properties such as “impossibility” and “symmetry along the vertical midline.” However, across all sets of shapes, children are expected to show improved categorization skills on these sorting tasks after instructions are given.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1951/72831
    Collections
    • 2015 SUNY Undergraduate Research Conference [409]

    SUNY Digital Repository Support
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

     


    SUNY Digital Repository Support
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV