• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Stony Brook University
    • Stony Brook Theses & Dissertations [SBU]
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Stony Brook University
    • Stony Brook Theses & Dissertations [SBU]
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Soaring Over Metropolis: How Readers Comprehend Realistic and Fantastic Stories

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Foy_grad.sunysb_0771E_10997.pdf (268.1Kb)
    Date
    1-May-12
    Author
    Foy, Jeffrey Evan
    Publisher
    The Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Narrative worlds often include features that would be implausible in the real world: Characters remain eternally youthful carpets can fly. For my dissertation, I conducted five experiments that demonstrated how the accessibility of knowledge specific to particular fictional worlds affects readers' comprehension of plausible and implausible events. In Experiment 1, participants were faster to read events that fit within narrative worlds (e.g., bullets bouncing off Superman's chest), even when those events were implausible in the real world. In Experiment 2, participants read about familiar characters experiencing events that were either highly plausible (e.g., Superman shooting lasers from his eyes), mildly implausible (e.g., Superman hypnotizing a criminal with his eyes), or very implausible (e.g., Superman turning a criminal to stone). Participants read the highly plausible events fastest. There were no significant differences in reading times between the mildly and very implausible events. The stories in Experiment 3 described ordinary characters (e.g., a bank teller) in realistic or fantastic worlds (e.g., Metropolis) experiencing realistic events (e.g., being killed by bullets) or implausible events (e.g., bullets bouncing off their chest). Participants were consistently slower to read about ordinary people experiencing implausible events, even within the context of fantasy worlds. In Experiment 4, participants read about ordinary characters, unfamiliar fantastic characters (e.g., a native of Krypton), or familiar fantastic characters (e.g., Superman) experiencing implausible events. Participants were slowest to read sentences containing an ordinary character, and there were no differences in reading times for sentences with the familiar and unfamiliar fantastic characters. In Experiment 5 participants read about the same characters from Experiment 4 experiencing realistic events. Participants were fastest for the unfamiliar ordinary characters, and equally slow for the familiar and unfamiliar fantastic characters. Taken together, these studies clarify how readers use their real-world knowledge, prior knowledge about a particular fictional world, and textual cues to assess the plausibility of events in narratives.
    Description
    45 pg.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1951/59649
    Collections
    • Stony Brook Theses & Dissertations [SBU] [1955]

    SUNY Digital Repository Support
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

     


    SUNY Digital Repository Support
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV