Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPopovici, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-01T15:52:44Z
dc.date.available2012-08-01T15:52:44Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1951/57162
dc.descriptionviii, 63 leaves : ill. ; 28 cm.en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose of this study was to determine if partial vascular occlusion of working musculature during all out cycling on an ergometer would improve peak-power output, as measured during a Wingate Test. Subjects were separated into three training groups: a low-load occluded group (LLO, n=7), a low-load free-flow group (LL, n=7) and a high-load free flow group (HL, n=7). The low-load groups (LL and LLO) trained twice a week at 45% of the resistance used during their Wingate test, while the high-load group (HL) trained twice per week at 95% of the resistance used during Wingate testing. Training involved short sprint intervals at a maximum cadence ranging in time from 4 to 10 seconds per repetition, and 4 to 8 repetitions per session. After 10 training sessions, subjects in the LLO group and subjects in a HL group both improved significantly from pre to post testing in relative peak power (watts/kilogram) by 14.4% and 14.1% respectively, while individuals in the LL group saw no significant improvement in relative peak power (4.6%). The LLO group improved significantly over the LL (p = .041), while the HL group’s improvement, compared to the LL group, nearly reached significance (p = .082). Utilizing low-load training under partially occluded conditions during sprinting on a cycle ergometer results in significant improvement to relative peak power output.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectIsokinetic exercise.en_US
dc.subjectCycling -- Physiological aspects.en_US
dc.subjectMuscle strength.en_US
dc.titleThe impact of low-load training with partial vascular occlusion on cycle ergometer peak poweren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record