Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSteinbock, Bonnie
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-05T19:38:22Z
dc.date.available2011-09-05T19:38:22Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1951/52171
dc.description.abstractEmbryonic stem cell research is morally and politically controversial because the process of deriving the embryonic stem (ES) cells kills embryos. If embryos are, as some would claim, human beings like you and me, then ES cell research is clearly impermissible. If, on the other hand, the blastocysts from which embryonic stem cells are derived are not yet human beings, but rather microscopic balls of undifferentiated cells, as others maintain, then ES cell research is probably morally permissible. Whether the research can be justified depends on such issues as its cost, chance of success, and numbers likely to benefit. But this is an issue for any research project, not just ES cell research. What makes the debate over ES cell research controversial is that it, like the debate over abortion, raises “questions that politicians cannot settle: when does human life begin, and what is the moral status of the human embryo?”1 This paper looks at several theories of moral status and their implications for embryo research.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleThe Morality of Killing Human Embryosen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record